There is a growing movement in US politics to invade the US military into Mexico to crush the drug cartel groups in Mexico’s southern neighbour. The Republican Party, which is strong in the southern part of the US, is active in the invasion against Mexico, and former President Trump, who is seeking a comeback, has said he would invade Mexico if elected. In November 2019, when he was president, Trump designated Mexican drug gangs as terrorist organisations and tried to pave the way for expanding the charge of his anti-drug policy to include the military (DOD, CIA, DHS) in the war on terror, in addition to the previous police agencies such as the FBI (Bureau of Investigation) and DEA (Drug Enforcement Administration), but his aides The following month, however, it was cancelled due to opposition from aides and others. The US media, with its strong Democratic Party and military-industrial bias, reported this as a crazy Trump outburst.
However, Mexican drug gangs have continued to grow in power over the past quarter century, becoming stronger than the Mexican government. They not only export drugs such as cannabis and methamphetamine to the US, but have also mixed with illegal immigrants to enter the US and establish drug distribution networks, and in recent years have become a criminal organisation that spans the US-Mexico border. The US authorities have (deliberately) failed to crack down on drug gangs. As the drug gangs continue to expand, the Democrats cannot cut and run with the idea of designating them as terrorist organisations and having the US military invade them against the ink. On 27 April, Biden issued a presidential decree to deploy US military reserve units to the US-Mexico border to crack down on drug smuggling between the US and Mexico.
Prior to this, in December last year, Biden declared a state of national emergency regarding drug smuggling between the US and Mexico. The current deployment of reserve officers is a concrete measure of this. With these declarations, in addition to the existing FBI and DAE, the Department of Defence (DOD), the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the CIA, the military-affiliated US agencies, are now in charge of the fight against drug gangs. The war on terror against drug gangs has already begun, without the need for a terrorist designation, and the US military is ready to invade Mexico. The Democratic US government is following Trump’s war on terror against black ink behind the scenes, while making fun of him on the surface.
Prior to this, in December last year, Biden declared a state of national emergency regarding drug smuggling between the US and Mexico. The current deployment of reserve officers is a concrete measure of this. With these declarations, in addition to the existing FBI and DAE, the Department of Defence (DOD), the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the CIA, the military-affiliated US agencies, are now in charge of the fight against drug gangs. The war on terror against drug gangs has already begun, without the need for a terrorist designation, and the US military is ready to invade Mexico. The Democratic US government is following Trump’s war on terror against black ink behind the scenes, while making fun of him on the surface.

The problems posed to the US by Mexican drug gangs are growing. But attacking the drug gangs militarily will not solve anything, in fact, it will dramatically worsen the situation. The Mexican drug gangs are using their huge revenues to build up their military intelligence (espionage capabilities) with large numbers of weapons and combatants. Mexican politics, police and courts are infiltrated by the drug gangs through bribes and threats to kill, and do not co-operate with the US war effort. Drug gangs have also spread their underground organisation to the US, where countless personnel are mixed in with the more than one million illegal immigrants who enter the US from Mexico every year. If the US military invades Mexico and attacks drug gangs, they will launch acts of terror and vandalism in the US in retaliation. Drug dealers turn into bomb-makers.
This war transforms an organisation whose purpose was to sell drugs into a powerful fighting organisation and terrorist organisation fighting the US Drug organisations are inversely coloured by being designated as terrorist organisations by the US. The US turns drug organisations into powerful enemies within the US. This is similar to the way in which the US has made al-Qaida a powerful enemy. Due to years of (deliberate) inaction by the US government, the US-Mexican border is full of loopholes, making it easy for drug gangs to bring in their tools of war. If war breaks out, the US economy and society will quickly become unstable and collapse. Drug gangs are far stronger than the Taliban or al-Qaida and have roots on US soil. This war would wreak havoc on the US and Mexico.
In the event of war within the US, the US government would establish a strong contingency regime, with the authorities extrajudicially spying on citizens and controlling and detaining speech The contingency regime within the US since 911 would be strengthened at a rapid pace. The US will cease to be a country of complete rule of law. Stripping the sovereignty of the people for bogus reasons is the same composition as the new Corona and the Great Reset. (People still don’t realise it and wear masks. Do it for the rest of your life. We don’t want sovereignty in the first place.) As this war rages, the US will be too busy fighting domestic wars to rule the world. The Middle East and Ukraine will not matter. It will increasingly tend to abandon its allies, including Europe and Japan. The zombification of US hegemony will increase. The invasion against ink will not solve the US drug problem at all. The US authorities have been cracking down on drugs for over 40 years and have completely failed. The US authorities have been (hidden multipolarist) in aggravating, not solving, the drug problem. Drugs are easily available in the US. The US has long been in the same situation whether it cracks down on drugs or not. Legalising drugs and creating an official distribution network would reduce the price of drugs and make the ink drug gangs go down economically. As with cigarettes, higher prices will not reduce the number of drug addicts, and lower prices will not increase the number of drug addicts as much. Many say the best solution to the drug problem is legalisation. But the DEA, the Drug Enforcement Administration, has been vehemently opposed to legalisation and has crushed political movements towards it, just as the military-industrial complex, including the DOD and the CIA, have covertly welcomed (rather than promoted) the ‘eternal war on terror’ of 911, promoting a drug problem that will never be solved.
Viewed as a history of US intelligence, the drug war, the perpetuation of the drug problem and the quagmire of Latin American domination that developed in Latin America from the 1970s is homogeneous with the quagmire of Middle Eastern domination that began around the same time with the conflicts in Afghanistan and Lebanon and continued with the post-9/11 war on terror. It is also homogeneous with the Vietnam War that unfolded before it. These were early developments of hidden multipolarism that bogged down the intelligence community’s management of US hegemony. The Bushes, who profited from the Texas oil business and became president as father and son, were close to the Saudi royal family, and Papa Bush was involved in both Middle East and Latin American domination as a CIA operative. As Vice-President, Papa Bush was in charge of the practicalities of the Iran-Contra affair, in which weapons were sold to Iran in the Middle East in return for the release of hostages, the proceeds of which were injected into the Nicaraguan Contras in Latin America. The quagmire of US hegemony through guerrilla warfare that developed in the Middle East and Latin America in the 1970s and 1980s was reignited by the war on terror in the wake of 911 in 2001, and then floundered by wars in Iraq, Afghanistan and Syria, culminating in the current proposed US invasion of Mexico to put an end to US hegemony. The US is now trying to put an end to US hegemony with the proposed invasion of Mexico.
There is a precedent for the US military invasion of Mexico. The US invaded Mexico in the 1840s, taking Texas and California and making them its own territory. But things are different now than in the past. Mexico is now part of the NAFTA and USMCA free trade zones and is economically inextricably merged with the US. Mexico is the 15th largest economy in the world. It is not like smaller countries like Afghanistan or Nicaragua. Mexico is politically close to the US. It is very different from countries such as Iraq and Syria, which were invaded by the US as enemies.
The Mexican Government is, of course, vehemently opposed to the US invasion. The US invasion against Mexico is a humanitarian crime in violation of international law (although the war on terror is the justification for the invasion). Why does the US want to carry out an invasion that destroys itself and Mexico? The answer is probably “because it is the ultimate hidden multipolar strategy to destroy US hegemony. The wars in Iraq and Afghanistan did not destroy the US mainland, but the invasion against the US-Mexico will turn the US mainland into a boggy battlefield of a ‘real war on terror’ like Iraq after the invasion, decisively destroying it. So when hegemonic abandoner Trump tried to pave the way for the invasion by designating the drug gangs as terrorist organisations in 2019, all the hegemonic-keeping (military-industrial) government officials opposed him and killed the story.
Four years have passed since then. Drug gangs continue to enter and expand in the United States. The situation in the world and in the US has become easier for radical measures to pass through the Ukrainian war, the Corona, the Great Reset, the Awakening movement that destroys social structures and the repeated Democratic Party electoral fraud. There is an opportunity to reintroduce the idea of an invasion against the ink. Opposition from the US upper echelons will continue to be strong, as it is clear that an invasion against ink would be self-destructive for the US. However, the road to invasion is already hidden, such as Biden’s decision to deploy US military reserve units to the US-Mexico border to fight drug gangs, rather than to stop illegal immigration. In the future, if a staged terrorist or military attack like the 911 incident occurs between the US and Mexico, and the culprits are (falsely) said to be drug gangs, this could be an opportunity for a US military invasion against Mexico to become a reality.

Leave a Reply